Development and evaluation of a simple treatment eligibility score (HEPSANET) to decentralise hepatitis B care in Africa: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) elimination requires expanding and decentralising HBV care services. However, peripheral health facilities lack access to diagnostic tools to assess eligibility for antiviral therapy. Through the Hepatitis B in Africa Collaborative Network (HEPSANET), we aimed to develop and evaluate a score using tests generally available at lower-level facilities, to simplify the evaluation of antiviral therapy eligibility in people living with HBV. METHODS: We surveyed the availability of clinical and laboratory parameters across different health-care levels in sub-Saharan Africa. We used data from the HEPSANET dataset, the largest cross-sectional dataset of treatment-naive people living with HBV in sub-Saharan Africa, to derive and validate the score. Participants from this dataset were included in the analysis if they were aged 18 years or older and had liver fibrosis stages determined by a liver stiffness measurement or liver histopathology. Participants with co-infections or metabolic disorders were excluded. We allocated participants to the derivation and validation sets by geographical site. In the derivation set, we used stepwise logistic regression to identify the best performing parameters for identifying participants that met the 2017 European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria. Regression coefficients were converted into integer points to construct simplified algorithms for different health-care levels. In the validation set, we estimated the area under the receiver operating characteristic, sensitivity, and specificity of the simplified algorithm for identifying antiviral therapy eligibility defined by the 2017 EASL criteria. FINDINGS: At 11 sites from eight countries that returned surveys, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and platelet count were generally available at district hospital levels, and hepatitis B e antigen and point-of-care HBV DNA tests were available only at regional and provincial hospital levels or above. Among 2895 participants included from the HEPSANET database (1740 [60·1%] male, 1155 [39·9%] female), 409 (14·1%) met EASL antiviral therapy eligibility criteria. In the derivation set, the optimal district-level hospital score was: ALT (IU/L), less than 40 (0 points), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); AST (IU/L), less than 40 (0), 40-79 (+1), 80 or greater (+2); and platelet counts (109/L), less than 100 (+2), 100-149 (+1), 150 or greater (0). When combined with family history and clinical data for decompensated cirrhosis that do not require any biological tests, a cut-off of 2 points or more had a sensitivity and specificity of 82% (95% CI 76-86) and 95% (93-96) to identify treatment-eligible individuals in the derivation set, and 78% (71-85) and 87% (86-89) in the validation set, respectively. INTERPRETATION: Using a score incorporating platelet counts, AST, and ALT, the majority of people living with HBV requiring antiviral therapy can be identified. Our findings suggest that clinical staging can be decentralised down to district hospital level in sub-Saharan Africa. FUNDING: European Association for the Study of the Liver Foundation, John C Martin Foundation. TRANSLATION: For the French translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Screening for Hepatitis B in partners and children of women positive for surface antigen, Burkina Faso.

Objective: To evaluate the implementation of a screening strategy for the partners and children of pregnant women with hepatitis B virus (HBV) attending antenatal care. Methods: We identified pregnant women positive for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg) at antenatal consultation in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. At post-test counselling, women were advised to disclose their HBV status to partners and to encourage their partner and children to be screened for HBsAg. We used multivariable logistic regression to explore factors associated with uptake of screening and HBsAg positivity among family members. Findings: Of 1000 HBsAg-positive women, 436/1000 partners and 215/1281 children were screened. HBsAg was detected in 55 (12.6%) partners and 24 (11.2%) children. After adjusting for confounders, uptake of screening was higher in partners who were married, who attended the woman's first post-test consultation and to whom the woman had disclosed her HBV status. In children, HBsAg positivity was associated with being born before the introduction of infant hepatitis B vaccination in Burkina Faso (not significant in the multivariable analysis), having a mother positive for HBV e-antigen (adjusted OR: 8.57; 95% CI: 2.49-29.48) or having a mother with HBV DNA level ≥ 200 000 IU/mL (OR: 6.83; 95% CI: 1.61-29.00). Conclusion: In low-income countries, the antenatal consultation provides a cost-effective opportunity to identify HBV-infected household contacts and link them to care. Children born before the introduction of infant hepatitis B vaccination and whose mother has higher viral load or infectivity should be a priority for testing and linkage to care.